A lot is made on the forum of the scarcity of young steel players and the difficulty of getting into the instrument.
While the difficulty of the steel is undoubtedly linked to its mechanics, there is also the issue of making an easy and safe purchase.
Nearly every intermediate player I know has at some point been sold a guitar with a deeply troubling history and set of issues. Some have been put off the instrument by this. We are all aware of instruments that circulate between owners every few years, who each underplay the instrument's faults in order to make their money back and save face.
In my case, I recently imported a publicly recommended steel from the states to find problems beyond what was advertised. I was able to secure a partial refund, in order to sell it on at its true value. It was picked up by an experienced player, well equipped to deal with its issues and not an intermediate, who would have been stuck like I was. In this sense, I feel I did the right thing.
Consumer protection and transparency is very important, so developing players may purchase their first 'pro' instrument safely and with full disclosure.
Are we doing enough? Based on the evidence of my eyes, I don't think so. This is a very small community and it can be very easy to conceal or underplay a steel's shortcomings, even with a less experienced player getting to try it first. There can also be considerable unspoken pressure not to speak badly of another steelie.
I think that this is something that needs to be discussed so as to come to some sort of community understanding regarding the selling of steels to players who may be vulnerable through their lack of experience. I would love it if people would share their stories and suggestions below.





