Basil Henriques wrote:Jif wrote:I don't doubt that you are correct Basil, but I still enjoyed both versions![]()
Agreed Jim, but in my heart and soul I can't enjoy them when I know the musicians are not giving a damn about the tune..One can only give so much latitude before it changes from "Artistic Interpretation" to "DILIGAF"
In the case of Tom Brumley, his playing is SO good and the recording is pristine with obviously first rate musicians, it's hard to not think that someone somewhere just didn't give a shit about Santo's chords that were intended to be played under the melody. ! Tom cleverly avoids the harmonies at the point that would underline the chordal mistake, so I can presume that he modified those lower notes to suit the backing. It goes without saying that Tom would have been very familiar with the original and all its nuances: he shows that by his superb embellishments and grace notes.. No it's not his fault that the chords are wrong.. I praise him for maintaining the melody whilst playing over the incorrect chords.
But a question for you Geoff, how familiar are you with the original ? Just curious..
ANYONE notice anything unusual in this version ?
Not as familiar as you are Basil obviously, I'm pretty new to steel, I have listened to it on many occasions but more as a listener than a steel player.
I understand what you are saying, if you know a piece really well and someone doesn't play it to the script it can be annoying, and as you say the gap can move away from the bounds of artistic interpretation. However, the occasional mistake or misinterpretation doesn't always spoil things for me, I tend to enjoy the good bits
Probably why I'll never be as precise as lot of other players but at this stage of my life I just want to play the best I can and enjoy it





