BJ was the first player I heard as a youngster that made me aware of the beauty and range (and existence!) of the instrument and I'm fortunate enough to know him a bit and have had a few lessons from him - so I don't find his comments at all surprising. I can think of no other player that has recorded across more musical genres with more different sounds: pop, rock, folk, jazz, classical, ambient, avant grade and country (just look at this one small corner of his CV:
http://www.bjcole.co.uk/sessions/countr ... .htm#LJ_CA). He's far from against pedal steel in country music, but he's worked his entire career to make sure it isn't LIMITED to one genre.
Or one sound. Let's face it there is one overriding, dominant "voice" to the pedal steel, the one you hear at steel shows, solid state, super clean, big bass, mids cut, loads of presence, digital delay or reverb.
Without wishing to put words into his mouth BJ has also expressed his frustration with the "one neck for country, one neck for swing" concept, which is the dominant way of thinking about and teaching the instrument. Fair enough, who needs limitations?
Well I'll be honest I quite like limitations. I'm never going to be on BJ's level as a musician, I play out-and-out classic country music in my band and that will be the main thing that I love to do until I've got anywhere close to mastering it (which I don't predict will happen). I like to think that DOESN'T mean my mind is closed to other genres, sounds or turnings however and thankfully BJ opened my mind up to all that good stuff from the very beginning.
Jonathan