by Jif » Wed Aug 21, 2024 11:52 am
Thanks Willie, not too bad atm, Janice is fine. Hope you are well.
Yeah, totally get where you're coming from. TBH if you have your steel set up how you like it, don't muck about changing the setup etc then what's the advantages of this.
An advantage for players who use a double neck and are getting on a bit where weight becomes a problem, then you can have a single neck which can do either E9 or C6 at the touch of a switch. If you like experimenting with different copedents, then this steel would make that a doddle compared to spending a lot of time readjusting rods etc. For example, if you were using a zero pedal, this could be setup with the Franklin change for a tune that requires it and then changed to a totally different function for another tune. Playing in a different key would also be possible if you were backing a singer who required a different key to what you are used to playing it in. Granted, an experienced player could change key without much difficulty but they might not be able to play exactly the same riffs etc as in the original key.
Another advantage is that you could totally compensate for cabinet drop for any pedal/lever combinations. Splits would also be in tune without having to use split screws or the double rod method.
One of the problems that he has identified is that the acoustic sound of the steel would be different to what you are hearing coming out of your amp. This could be off-putting, which is why he is currently building 2 steels, one with a 'normal' style cabinet, the other with a cabinet which damps the acoustic sound so you basically don't hear it. I don't know how this would change the amplified tone, it will be interesting to hear the results once he gets them up and running.
I reckon these will not be cheap, I could be wrong, so there might not be an big enough incentive to replace an existing mechanical steel. Especially if you are outside the US where transport and taxes would be a big factor in the final cost.
I have read that when players started to introduce pedals and levers to steels this was frowned on at the time by some. The story of how a player, (can't remember offhand who, Zane Beck?), had to disguise he was using pitch change by using a lever rather than a pedal so the band leader wouldn't know he was doing it as he didn't approve of this new fangled technique. Think this was how levers originally became a thing. In any case, the point is that there is always resistance to change.
Will this be a success? I think as far as it working as planned and sounding good, it's almost a done deal. Will players buy them, is there a market for them? That's an open question and time will tell once he gets them to a production stage.
If I was younger and could afford one I would almost certainly buy one, though I think I would keep my existing steel.