by Ken Byng » Sun Feb 01, 2015 10:41 am
Mike Brown from Peavey asked on the US steel forum for suggestions of what features people would like to see on a new amp. This was about 3 years ago. As you can imagine, there was no commonality of response with virtually all permutations being suggested. Therein lies the problem. Do you make an amp based on your own thoughts of what makes a great steel amp - à la Dave Beaty - or based on what the consensus have indicated that they want?
I like the idea of an amp or guitar designed and manufactured by a steel player, as they have first hand thoughts on what they would like to see/hear. The majority of modern steel guitar companies are headed by a player, rather than a non playing engineer. This has resulted in very playable and nice sounding guitars being the norm.
As a commercial activity, making steel guitar amps is not a viable and sustainable business. Peavey must have realised this fact many times over in the past decades. It is this fact alone that makes me wonder why on earth they would want to set up and build a new steel amp for the kind of numbers that are likely to sell in the hundreds at best. 6 string guitar amps can sell in thousands world-wide, and that market is very sustainable.
Show Pro D10 (amber) 8 + 6, MSA Signature XL D10 (redburst) 9 + 6, Sho~Bud D10 (sunburst) Pro 111 8 + 6, Emmons D10 Push Pull - (black) 8+5, Zumsteel D10 (blue) 8 + 8, Hudson pedal resonator, 10 string lap steel. Telonics, Peavey & Webb amps,